LEED GAP

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
查看: 504|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

When calculating materials costs for some of the MR credit calculations, what is

[复制链接]

1759

主题

1

好友

5674

积分

管理员

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-12 16:22:18 |只看该作者 |正序浏览
试卷: LEED AP BD+C模拟题A[查看]
When calculating materials costs for some of the MR credit calculations, what is the potential
benefit of using the actual materials costs vs. the default 45% materials cost?(choose 2)
A: It is easier to break out the material costs from labor and equipment
B: It streamlines the documentation process
C: It becomes easier to earn an Innovation in Design point for exemplary performance
D: Projects with less than 45% materials cost can achieve credit thresholds more easily

参考答案: CD

本题解释:
Notes:

LEED allows a 45% default materials cost to be used. For example, if the project cost is
$10,000,000, the value of materials used on the project can be assumed to be $4,500,000.


Let\'s look at an example for MR Credit 5


Given a $10,000,000 project cost

The actual local materials used total: $1,500,000

The actual materials cost used is: $3,000,000

The default value of materials used is $10,000,000 X 0.45 = $4,500,000

% of local materials = Total Cost of Local Materials / Total Cost of Materials


Using the actual materials cost = $1,500,000 / $3,000,000 = 50% local materials


Using the default materials cost = $1,500,000 / 4,500,000 = 33% local materials


As you can see, when the actual materials cost is less than 45% of the project cost, a greater
threshold can be achieved. Because the thresholds are greater, it is easier to achieve both the credit
and an ID point by meeting the next threshold. In this example, by using the 45% default value the
project earned MR Credit 5.2. Using the actual costs, the project earned MR Credit 5.2 and one ID
point for using more than 40% regional materials.


{It is easier to break out the material costs from labor and equipment} incorrect because it is
often more difficult to break out the materials costs (that is why a 45% default material cost is
allowed).


{It streamlines the documentation process} is incorrect because calculating actual materials cost
will result in more paperwork by keeping track of all the receipts.
分享到: QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
分享分享0 收藏收藏0
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

关闭

站长推荐上一条 /1 下一条

Archiver|手机版|LEED GA/LEED AP考试学习平台|版权所有|备案号(沪ICP备11019119号-2)|leedgap   

GMT+8, 2024-12-26 10:26 , Processed in 0.073952 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2.5 & Exam 1.4

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

回顶部